9984 stories
·
100 followers

Google Staff Resign In Backlash Over Its AI Contracts With Military

1 Share
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: Google is facing a backlash from some staff members over the company's deployment of its AI technology for military use. The BBC has spoken to several tech workers who have either recently resigned from Google's AI company, Google DeepMind, or are in the process of leaving, over concerns with the tech firm's military contracts. Sofia Liguori, a London-based research engineer, is one of them. She resigned from Google DeepMind this week and spoke about her concerns exclusively with the BBC, despite her contract restricting her from doing so. "Realizing my company is pushing more and more for AI systems in military operations makes me feel ashamed to work at Google," Liguori said, speaking in a personal capacity. [...] After working for the company for three years, Liguori said she decided to resign over Google's increasing work with the US and Israeli militaries. "I don't agree with this direction and this has led me to lose faith in my company being true to its stated ethical values," she said. Those values, according to Google's AI Principles, include implementing AI with "human oversight" and aligning the technology with "international law and human rights." But former and current staff at the company, and experts the BBC spoke to, said they were concerned about the level of human oversight at critical moments. The tech workers said they are particularly worried about the AI military deals signed this year, because they greatly increase the scope of what the Pentagon can use the technology for. Andreas Kirsch, an AI researcher, also resigned from Google DeepMind earlier this month over his concerns. Kirsch told the BBC that he believes "Google's governance and oversight are not sufficient or meaningful enough to deploy AI safely and responsibly in military and classified settings" or "to develop artificial superintelligence safely in the future." "Google seems to have no right to control or veto how the Pentagon uses its AI and also seems to have limited visibility into how it's being deployed," he added. [...] Employees at Google have told the BBC that staff are scared to speak out about AI safety and its uses in warfare because their employment contracts prohibit them from publicly criticizing the company. "In principle I'm not allowed to criticize Google for the duration of my life," Sofia Liguori told the BBC. But she decided to do so "because I believe it's important for these things to be known and I also think that talking about facts is not criticizing." Liguori added that at Google "people are scared of retaliation and putting their career at risk. You feel you are being watched, you can't speak." A current employee at Google DeepMind, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation, told the BBC that "a lot of motivated employees who signed up for [the company's] original mission could leave -- but there's also a pipeline of people at the start of the careers who could fill those positions. It could be a changing of the guard." Another Google DeepMind staff member, who also wished to remain anonymous, told the BBC: "A lot of people have left the company that feel strongly about this [how Google DeepMind has changed its ethics position]." "Some people are putting up a fight, others are thinking: 'it's a big company. What do you expect to change?'", the employee said. In response, a Google spokesperson told the BBC: "We work with public sector organisations worldwide and follow a consistent process for reviewing and entering these contracts, including compliance with our acceptable use policies and AI principles." "We also have dedicated channels for employees to safely raise any concerns -- ranging from business ethics to misconduct -- and have strict workplace policies in place to prevent retaliation of any kind."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
14 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Mass Effect and Dragon Age studio BioWare killed by its new corporate overlords

1 Share

A couple of weeks back, a consortium of new owners—including the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia, a private equity company, and Professional Son-In-Law Jared Kushner’s Affinity investment group—completed their leveraged buyout of Electronic Arts, one of the biggest video game companies on the planet. Given the state of both the private equity playbook and the video game industry as a whole these days, the only real surprise about what happened next might be that it took more than a month to roll out: Mass layoffs at several EA studios, including the full closure of BioWare, the famed studio behind hit role-playing game franchises like Mass Effect and Dragon Age.

The studio announced the closure on Twitter earlier today, where it was, shock of shocks, treated to the gleeful hooting and hollering of various GamerGate-brained forces crowing about the death of a studio that put genuine work into trying to meet its players—and, specifically, its LGBTQ+ players—where they lived. With games that often included romances between player characters and their NPC companions as a major selling point, BioWare spent years navigating what it’s like to invite players of all stripes to see themselves in the characters they controlled. The results weren’t uniformly artful, but they were always earnest: a genuine good-faith effort to expand the definition of how video game avatars present, act, and love.

BioWare has, undeniably, struggled in recent years, though, in part thanks to decisions imposed upon it from its now-former corporate overlords. The studio has never returned to the heights it hit between 2012 and 2014, for instance, when it rolled out the final installments in the first Mass Effect and Dragon Age trilogies; attempts to return to those universes in later years never attained the same acclaim, nor did the studio’s one major push to break into a new IP with Anthem, a multiplayer action game released in 2019, and which wound up embodying many of the worst aspects of the dawning era of our current games-as-service hell.

Per Kotaku, EA laid off roughly 400 people this week, representing roughly 3 percent of its workforce across multiple studiops. Gaming companies being how they are, they announced these job losses to staff in an email crowing about being “The number one publisher in Western HD gaming.”



Read the whole story
InShaneee
14 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Data centers could erase decades of air quality gains

1 Share
Photo collage of a data center.

A rush of new data centers could bring air pollution roaring back to levels not seen since the 2000s in Texas, which has become ground zero for the physical infrastructure behind generative AI.

New and proposed data centers are demanding a tremendous amount of electricity. How developers and utilities meet that demand - with gas turbines or renewable energy - will determine just how dirty things will get. So far, though, things are looking grim.

Tech companies and data center developers are devising new ways to get enough electricity, including building out their own power sources. But if all planned data center projects were to plug into …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Cops Warned to Look for ‘Suspicious Behavior’ From People Opposing Flock at City Council Meetings

1 Share
Cops Warned to Look for ‘Suspicious Behavior’ From People Opposing Flock at City Council Meetings

A federal intelligence center warned police that city council meetings about Flock “may be viewed by extremists as a desirable target,” and told them to be on the lookout for “emotional confrontations” between people who oppose surveillance and government officials, according to a copy of the warning obtained by 404 Media.

The warning, obtained by 404 Media, was issued by the Orange County Intelligence Assessment Center (OCIAC)—a government fusion center—in July to police in California. 404 Media recently obtained the bulletin using a Freedom of Information Act request.

This surveillance bulletin to cops is the latest evidence that police around the country have been told to be on edge during public meetings where people are participating in democracy and utilizing their First Amendment rights about unpopular things the government is doing. We have reported on a spate of people being illegally arrested for extremely minor procedural violations or for cursing at city council meetings about Flock and data centers while participating in constitutionally protected activities.

The warning is similar to others obtained by 404 Media and other journalists about the broader DeFlock movement and vandalism of Flock surveillance cameras. But this warning specifically tells police that there have been “no specific and credible threats found” related to city council meetings about Flock, but warns they should be on the lookout anyway. The warning noted that anti surveillance organizers could have been emboldened by the news that the Los Angeles Police Department ended its Flock contract, and may expect other local governments to do the same. The LAPD’s decision was “providing organizers and participants with a high-profile local example that could increase turnout and place additional public pressure on City Council members” to end their Flock contracts, the bulletin claims.

“City-hosted events (i.e., city council meetings) may be viewed by extremists as a desirable target. Partners are encouraged to review for signs of suspicious activity,” the warning reads. This suspicious activity includes “excessive clothing,” “unusual questions or behavior,” people loitering,” or “unattended bags or packages.” 

The warning goes on to say that genuine interest in ending mass surveillance at a city council meeting “may present public safety risks,” which includes “large turnout exceeding room capacity,” “emotional confrontations,” counterdemonstrations,” “media presence,” “social media amplification,” and “disruption of council proceedings.” 

Here is a full excerpt of the portion of the warning about protected activities that could apparently “present public safety risks:” 

_
  • Large turnout exceeding room capacity: If organizers mobilize significantly more attendees than the council chambers can accommodate, this can lead to long lines, frustrated attendees, overflow areas, or delays in the meeting.
  • Emotional confrontations: Because the issue involves surveillance, privacy, immigration concerns, and public safety, speakers and attendees may have strong emotions. Verbal confrontations between supporters and opponents are more likely than at routine council meetings.
  • Counterdemonstrations: Individuals who support the Flock camera program or emphasize its crime-fighting benefits may attend and express opposing views, increasing the potential for verbal conflict.
  • Traffic and parking impacts: A well-attended meeting can create localized congestion around City Hall before and after the meeting.
  • Media presence: Local television, newspapers, livestreamers, and independent journalists may attend because the issue has recently received regional media coverage.
  • Social media amplification. Attendees may livestream or record interactions. Minor disputes can quickly spread online, increasing public attention.
  • Disruption of council proceedings. Possible issues include:
    • Interrupting speakers
    • Shouting from the audience
    • Refusing to yield the podium after time limits
    • Coordinated chanting inside the chambers
    • Attempts to delay or prevent the meeting from continuing
  • Physical altercations: Heated disagreements between attendees with opposing viewpoints could escalate into minor physical altercations, particularly during emotionally charged interactions before, during, or after the meeting.
  • Targeted threats or intimidation: Any credible threats, harassment, or intimidation directed toward elected officials, city staff, organizers, or attendees should be treated as a significant public safety concern and evaluated promptly.
  • Extremist-related activity: Although there is no publicly available information indicating extremist involvement, politically contentious events may attract isolated individuals seeking to promote unrelated ideological causes.
_

We have seen numerous people illegally arrested around the country for speaking slightly too long, talking out of turn, or for cursing at city council members, none of which are illegal activities. 

“The OCIAC recognizes that Americans have constitutionally protected rights to assemble, speak, and petition the government,” the warning ends. “The OCIAC safeguards these rights and only reports on First Amendment protected activities for operational planning in the interest of assuring the safety and security of the demonstrators and the public.”

Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Google Support Pages Start Defaulting to AI Chatbots

1 Share
Google is beginning to replace traditional support articles with "Ask Google Help," a Gemini-powered interface that summarizes documentation and lets users troubleshoot through a chatbot. 9to5Google reports: "Ask Google Help" will display a condensed version of the support article with direct troubleshooting steps, with the user then able to type in queries to have Gemini help figure out the next step forward. A "View Sources" button at the bottom of the AI response allows users to still access the original article, but direct links to any of these articles now defaults to the AI experience. An example can be seen below on the "Secure a hacked or compromised Google account" page that Google's own support account directed users to within the past few days. It can also be seen on the "Fix common issues with 2-Step Verification" page and, as far as we can tell, any support pages on the Google Account Help forum. Google, as of right now, appears to only be testing this on select support topics. The Google Pixel Help section, for instance, still defaults to articles, whereas the Google Chrome topic has also moved to the new experience. Beyond support pages alone, this new design also impacts the central hub, with links to topics no longer showing by default in exchange for an AI chatbot that helps you find the relevant page.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Trump DHS Officials Asked CISA To Secretly Aquire and Hack a Voting Machine

1 Share
Longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shares a report from ProPublica: A few months into President Donald Trump's second term, political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wanted Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to secretly acquire a voting machine and hack it. The appointees wanted the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to procure the machine, examine it and report back the findings so they could be given to the White House, according to two former administration officials with knowledge of the request. The proposition was shocking to CISA's career staffers, according to one of the former officials. CISA typically worked to thwart hackers. Moreover, the agency had been directed not to alert the voting machine company if it uncovered flaws, contrary to its standard practices. The request made the CISA employees fear they were being asked to take part in political interference. "My thought was they could keep it in their back pocket to invalidate any [election] results they don't like," one of the former officials said. "This goes against everything CISA represents." [Or, perhaps do something worse?] The CISA employees repeatedly told the political appointees that their request was impossible, in part because the agents capable of pulling off such an operation had just been laid off by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. The appointees eventually stopped pressing CISA. Though not acted on, the request shows how the Trump administration has tried to use the agency for its own ends while draining it of resources for one of its critical missions: protecting the nation's voting systems.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
3 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories