9737 stories
·
100 followers

A recent sex crime scandal could (and should) cause true reform in the manga industry

1 Share

[Editor’s note: This article contains descriptions of sexual assault and dehumanization.]

A longstanding manga industry injustice is back in the spotlight: Prominent publications have repeatedly and knowingly platformed authors convicted of sex crimes against children. On February 27, the editorial department behind MangaOne, a digital manga service, revealed they had allowed manga author Kazuaki Kurita (more widely known as Shōichi Yamamoto) to publish works under a pen name after he was convicted of a sex crime in 2020. The publication’s parent company, Shogakukan, gave this information after a civil lawsuit found Kurita guilty of abusing a female high school student. The company’s investigation also discovered that an editor at MangaOne attempted to help Kurita reach an out-of-court settlement with the victim.

The news sent a shockwave through the manga sphere, as several authors associated with the service, like ONE (Mob Psycho 100, One Punch Man), called out MangaOne for negligence and lobbied to have their series removed from the service. Then, Shogakukan revealed that MangaOne had an additional author who had been convicted of a sex crime working under a pen name, Tatsuya Matsuki (Act-age). It’s not just this service either, and other publications have stood by authors convicted of abusive acts.

As for Kazuaki Kurita, in 2020, he was arrested, indicted, and fined for violating the Child Prostitution and Pornography Prohibition Act before being ordered to pay a 300,000 yen penalty (roughly $2,700 at the time). Kurita had a series, Daten Sakusen, running in MangaOne under his first pen name, Shōichi Yamamoto. It went on hiatus the same month as his arrest, with the publisher saying the author was suffering from “health issues.” In 2022, it was removed from the service and rights were handed over to Kurita. The same year, MangaOne started to run a new series he was working on, Joujin Kamen, under his second pen name, “Hajime Ichiro.” Not only was the publication aware of his true identity, but at least one editor directly intervened on Kurita’s behalf in the case that would eventually rule against him on February 20, 2026. That editor was added to a LINE group chat with Kurita and the victim, and proposed that the author pay a 1.5 million yen fee as a settlement (around $13,700 at the time). The victim didn’t agree, eventually leading to a civil lawsuit where Kurita was ordered to pay 11 million yen (approximately $71,000). 

The victim met Kurita at a private high school where he was a teacher, and she was a student. She said that when she was 15, he groped her after offering to drive her home. Then, when she was 16, he invited her to a hotel where he raped her for the first time. According to Ashita no Keizai Shimbun, the lawsuit also stated that Kurita forced her into increasingly degrading acts that included taking pictures with the word “slave” written on her body and eating excrement as “punishment.” The victim said she felt forced to comply because “refusing would jeopardize her high school life” and that she “didn’t know what would happen if she refused when alone with him in a closed room.” She would later be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative identity disorder. Kurita admitted to having a relationship with the victim, but argued that it was “consensual” despite her being 15 the first time he assaulted her. In a statement after the ruling, the victim discussed how Kurita had deliberately acted like a father figure and groomed her.

The fact that Kurita’s editor not only knew about at least some of these allegations but also tried to help him buy the victim’s silence shows how abusive creators are both permitted and actively enabled to conduct this behavior in the manga industry. Whether the editor was attempting to sweep this clear case of grooming under the rug so they could get back to business or because they simply didn’t believe the victim, it’s clear that in some manga editors’ eyes, being credibly accused of sexually abusing children isn’t enough to sever ties.

This wasn’t the only case where MangaOne‘s editorial staff disregarded sexual abuse allegations, and an internal investigation by its parent company, Shogakukan, found that the publication had another author who was a convicted sex offender. Tatsuya Matsuki, who wrote the manga Act-age for the publication Weekly Shonen Jump, admitted to groping a middle school student in public before fleeing on a bicycle. He received an 18-month sentence, with a three-year suspended sentence. After the suspended sentence expired without Matsuki serving jail time, he was interviewed by an editor at MangaOne, and with the editor-in-chief’s approval, was allowed to begin a new series, Seisō no Shinri-shi, under the pen name Miki Yatsunami. Matsuki apparently suggested using the pen name, claiming it was to avoid reminding the victim of the incident. These circumstances are different in that Matsuki had apparently undergone rehabilitation related to his sentencing and claimed he used a pseudonym to avoid hurting the victim, but his actions, combined with those of several MangaOne editors, still come across as a deliberate attempt to deceive the public and avoid backlash.

MangaOne isn’t the only manga publication that has platformed authors convicted of sex crimes related to children: The best-selling manga magazine of all time, Weekly Shonen Jump (One Piece, Naruto, Dragon Ball, etc.), has done this repeatedly. Manga author Mitsutoshi Shimabukuro was arrested for soliciting sex from a minor in 2002, but Weekly Shonen Jump published several of his works after the fact, such as Chingiri, Build King, and his most well-known comic, Toriko. There’s also Nobuhiro Watsuki, the author of Shonen Jump’s popular Rurouni Kenshin, who was arrested in 2017 for possessing dozens of DVDs containing child pornography. After paying a fine, the magazine allowed him to come back to work on Rurouni Kenshin: The Hokkaido Arc just eight months after the arrest.

These incidents point to a pattern: Many editors at these magazines did not view sex crime convictions as something that should disqualify these authors from serialization. In response to the controversy, MangaOne’s editorial staff put out a statement clarifying that, in the case of Matsuki, they didn’t believe “he should be denied the possibility of aiming for reintegration into society” (translation from Google Translate). Even if that’s true, he shouldn’t have been allowed to duck responsibility by publishing anonymously. In the case of Watsuki, he didn’t even have to go through the trouble of dealing with cancellations and pen names, because Shonen Jump handed him back his popular series right after he was sentenced. This lack of consequences in both the manga sphere and the Japanese criminal justice system—none of the previously mentioned convictions resulted in actual jail time—establishes a structure of complicity where victims are left out to dry.

After Watsuki was convicted, Shonen Jump put together a 30th anniversary celebration for Rurouni Kenshin. A long list of the magazine’s biggest names drew tribute art, such as Eiichiro Oda (One Piece), Hirohiko Araki (JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure), Gege Akutami (Jujutsu Kaisen), Masashi Kishimoto (Naruto), Yoshihiro Togashi (Hunter x Hunter), and dozens more. None of them publicly spoke out against the author. In response to the more recent MangaOne controversies, animator Ikuo Gesu offered a particularly telling reaction on X (translation provided by Anime Updates): “Expecting manga artists to be pure, spotless, sacred, pristine figures… man, the world’s really changed. And not in a good way.” Even beyond whatever “cancel culture is bad”-related point Gesu was trying to make, it is essential to avoid platforming authors like Kurita because they can use their position to ensnare vulnerable people. According to reporting from Lawyer JP News, Kurita used his status as a published manga artist to groom his victim, who had wanted to enter the field. He allegedly told her things like “I’ll tell you about manga” and “I’ll tell you some behind-the-scenes stories” when he invited her to private locations off school grounds. Sexual predators like Harvey Weinstein have used a similar tack, using their power and influence in the entertainment industry to coerce their victims with promises of helping them break through in an extremely competitive field.

If there’s a thin silver lining in the MangaOne scandal, it’s that numerous creators have pulled their series from the app in response, showing that many in the industry are disgusted with these circumstances. Authors like Sumito Oowara (Keep Your Hands Off Eizouken!), Ryuhei Tamura (Cosmos), and more have condemned MangaOne and had their series either removed or suspended from the service. Eno Akemi, another author serialized in the publication, drew attention to the controversy on their blog and called out several editors who enabled Kurita by name. 

While only time will tell if this backlash leads to meaningful change in the industry, manga publications can begin with a very simple step: Don’t platform people who have been convicted of sexually abusing children. That would seem a straightforward ask, but in a world where the rich and powerful named in the Epstein files have largely evaded justice, it will likely take continued financial blowback and brave people willing to put their livelihoods on the line to make that happen.



Read the whole story
InShaneee
16 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Two Long-Lost Episodes of 'Doctor Who' Found

1 Share
Longtime Slashdot reader tsuliga writes: Two new episodes of Doctor Who that were previously lost have been found. The original Doctor Who episodes were wiped or deleted by the BBC because they were not aware of the future use of re-runs of these shows. Ninety-five of the 253 episodes from the program's first six years are currently missing. How many more episodes are out there waiting to be rediscovered? "The main broadcasters in the UK in the 1960s, 70s, up to the 80s really, junked quite a lot of content," said Justin Smith, a cinema professor at England's De Montfort University and film archivist. "In some ways finding missing 'Doctor Whos' is the holy grail" of classic TV discoveries, Smith said. The two episodes were "The Nightmare Begins" and "Devil's Planet," both of which aired during the show's third series in 1965. It features William Hartnell as the Doctor in a story involving archvillains the Daleks -- pepperpot-shaped metal aggressors whose favorite word is "Exterminate!" Smith said that for fans of the show, "it's got it all, it really has. It is intergalactic, it's got some great performances. It stands up really, really well."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Instagram Discontinues End-To-End Encryption For DMs

1 Share
Meta plans to remove end-to-end encryption (E2EE) from Instagram direct messages by May 8, 2026. "Very few people were opting in to end-to-end encrypted messaging in DMs, so we're removing this option from Instagram in the coming months," says Meta. "Anyone who wants to keep messaging with end-to-end encryption can easily do that on WhatsApp." The Hacker News reports: The American company first began testing E2EE for Instagram direct messages in 2021 as part of CEO Mark Zuckerberg's "privacy-focused vision for social networking." The feature is currently "only available in some areas" and is not enabled by default. Weeks into the Russo-Ukrainian war in February 2022, the company made encrypted direct messaging available to all adult users in both countries. Last week, TikTok said it would not introduce E2EE, arguing it makes users less safe by preventing police and safety teams from being able to read direct messages if needed.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Grammarly ditches "Expert Review" after expert rebellion and class action suit

1 Share

The once defiant makers of Grammarly, Superhuman were forced to eat a little AI crow today. After enlisting countless authors, writers, and journalists for its much-needed “Expert Review” feature, the company has reversed course because it did so entirely without their consent, prompting a class action lawsuit. “Expert Mode” allowed Grammarly subscribers to receive phony analysis made by an LLM that’s been trained on the work of famous writers, living or dead, in an effort to “take your writing to the next level.” Of course, seeing as this is a tech company we’re talking about, and everything is just data for them to train their products on, Superhuman did so without the consent of its “leading professionals, authors, and subject-matter experts.” 

Earlier today, Wired reported that Markup founder Julia Angwin is the only named plaintiff in a class action suit against Superhuman, arguing damages exceeding $5 million. “We think it’s a pretty straightforward case,” Angwin’s attorney told Wired. He goes on to argue that this type of behavior from tech companies is happening across society. “Lots of professionals who spend years, or in Julia’s case, decades, honing a skill or a trade, then see that their name or their skills are being appropriated by others without their consent.”

The feature received widespread condemnation from the authors who were non-consentually recruited for the program, including tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI blogger Casey Newton, and the staff of The Verge. The latter reached out to Grammarly, which informed them earlier this week that victims of identity theft could “opt out” of the program they never signed up for. 

But apologies are a feature of the AI hype machine, not a bug, and so the CEO of Superhuman, Shishir Mehrotra performed the modern Notes app apology: An extended mealy-mouthed LinkedIn post. “Over the past week, we received valid critical feedback from experts who are concerned that the agent misrepresented their voices,” he wrote. “This kind of scrutiny improves our products, and we take it seriously. As context, the agent was designed to help users discover influential perspectives and scholarship relevant to their work, while also providing meaningful ways for experts to build deeper relationships with their fans. We hear the feedback and recognize we fell short on this. I want to apologize and acknowledge that we’ll rethink our approach going forward.”

So what did we learn here? For one thing, a future in which AI is firmly foisted upon users isn’t one that users have to stand for. Complaining about these products widely and loudly can help prevent the slop trough from filling too quickly. Additionally, we learned that a class action suit couldn’t hurt.

 



Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

How to Talk to Someone Experiencing 'AI Psychosis'

1 Share
How to Talk to Someone Experiencing 'AI Psychosis'

When David saw his friend Michael’s social media post asking for a second opinion on a programming project, he offered to take a look.

“He sent me some of the code, and none of it made sense, none of it ran correctly. Or if it did run, it didn't do anything,” David told me. David and his friend’s names have been changed in this story to protect their privacy. “So I'm like, ‘What is this? Can you give me more context about this?’ And Michael’s like, ‘Oh, yeah, I've been messing around with ChatGPT a lot.’” 

Michael then sent David thousands of pages of ChatGPT conversations, much of it lines of code that didn’t work. Interspersed in the ChatGPT code were musings about spirituality and quantum physics, tetrahedral structures, base particles, and multi-dimensional interactions. “It's very like, woo woo,” David told me. “And we ended up having this interesting conversation about, how do you know that ChatGPT isn't lying?” 

As their conversation turned from broken code to physics concepts and quantum entanglement, David realized something was very wrong. Talking to his friend — whom he’d shared many deep conversations with over the years, unpacking matters of religion and theories about the world and how people perceive it — suddenly felt like talking to a cultist. Michael thought he, through ChatGPT, discovered a critical flaw in humanity’s understanding of physics.

“ChatGPT had convinced him that all of this was so obviously true,” David said. “The way he spoke about it was as if it were obvious. Genuinely, I felt like I was talking to a cult member.” 

💡
Do you have experience with AI psychosis? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at sam.404. Otherwise, send me an email at sam@404media.co.

But at the time, David didn’t have a way to name, or even describe, what his friend was experiencing. Once he started hearing the phrase “AI psychosis” to describe other peoples’ problematic relationships with chatbots, he wondered if that’s what was happening to Michael. His friend was clearly grappling with some kind of delusion related to what the chatbot was telling him. But there’s no handbook or program for how to talk to a friend or family member in that situation. Having encountered these kinds of conversations myself and feeling similarly uncertain, I talked to mental health experts about how to talk to someone who appears to be embracing delusional ideas after spending too much time with a chatbot. 

Read the whole story
InShaneee
5 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Poll: A majority of Americans opposes U.S. military action in Iran

1 Share
Plumes of smoke rise following reported explosions in Tehran on Monday, after U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran on Feb. 28 killed Iran

Most Americans disapprove of President Trump's handling of Iran, and a majority sees Iran as either only a minor threat or no threat at all, an NPR/PBS News/Marist poll finds.

(Image credit: Sohrab)

Read the whole story
InShaneee
8 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories