9831 stories
·
100 followers

House approves labor-friendly bill with support from 20 Republicans

1 Share
The U.S. Capitol Building at dusk on May 12, 2026, in Washington, D.C.

The House has approved a bill to slash the time it takes for newly unionized workers to get a first contract. The measure allows for government intervention if a deal is not reached within 90 days.

(Image credit: Graeme Sloan)

Read the whole story
InShaneee
12 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

FCC Wants to Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms to Get All Customers’ IDs

3 Shares
FCC Wants to Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms to Get All Customers’ IDs

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to make it effectively impossible for people to buy what many call burner phones—a phone not explicitly linked to your identity at the point of purchase—which would impact privacy-conscious people, to domestic abuse survivors, to journalists, and many more. The FCC plans to do this by legally forcing the country’s telecoms to store a wealth of personal information about essentially all phone customers, including a government issued identification number and their physical address, alarming privacy advocates and civil rights activists who compare the measures to those from authoritarian countries where it can be difficult to buy a mobile phone plan without giving up your identity.

The proposed change would drastically shake up how people obtain phone plans in the U.S., and have all sorts of privacy and cybersecurity knock-on effects. The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers, with telecoms being required to collect other information on business and foreign customers like the intended use case of their bulk phone plan purchase and their IP address. But the changes would mean telecoms collect data on all new and renewing customers, and the FCC provides a long list of other things that the collected data could help authorities with.

💡
Do you know anything else about this proposed change? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at joseph.404 or send me an email at joseph@404media.co.

“For decades, civil libertarians have looked overseas at authoritarian countries where the government requires people to register to get a mobile phone to ensure they can be tracked. We never thought that would happen here,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project told 404 Media in an email. “But make no mistake: with this rulemaking, the government is contemplating taking away people’s ability to get a burner phone, which will hurt low-income people, domestic violence victims, and anyone else who cares about their privacy.”

Read the whole story
InShaneee
17 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

WWE's Cathy Kelley Opens Up About Autism Diagnosis in New Interview

1 Share
WWE backstage interviewer Cathy Kelley revealed that she has been diagnosed with autism.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
17 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Scott Pelley says Bari Weiss told 60 Minutes to make ICE protestors look more violent

1 Share

For months, we’ve heard from various people who worked at 60 Minutes that CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss has told them to change stories for political purposes (which CBS has always denied). Outside of a report on CECOT, which was held because Weiss felt it “was not ready,” we haven’t gotten many specifics. But with longtime correspondent and host Scott Pelley recently fired, there are few holds barring him in his latest interview with The New York Times. The long interview is a pretty fascinating look into the Weiss era of CBS News, with Pelley attempting to remain somewhat cordial despite saying the recent firings and changes are “like your spouse being murdered.” 

Specifically, Pelley finally details the bias and falsehoods that he said Weiss had tried to inject into his story. The story in question was one with a pretty quick turnaround during ICE’s occupation of Minneapolis this past winter, which included the deaths of Renée Good and Alex Pretti. “I felt it was very important to identify that the protesters themselves were being very aggressive and that they were half of these confrontations, and so I instructed my producers to find images in which we see the protesters acting aggressively,” says Pelley. “We found a picture of a protester chest-bumping an officer. We found a picture of an officer being hit in the head with a snowball. We culled together a lot of video of protesters screaming in the faces of officers because … it seemed to me important to tell the audience about the entire context. I thought we’d done a really good job with this.” 

Weiss disagreed. “[A]bout four hours after our deadline, Bari Weiss sends an email to my boss, Tanya Simon. Two of the things in the email include, can we make the protesters look more violent? Now, I’m paraphrasing. I don’t have the quote, but that’s what was communicated to me. And the other thing, Renee Good’s car. You need to describe her as driving toward the officer,” says Pelley. As he points out, the videos of Good’s death do not show her driving toward the officer, but that’s how the president framed it online and how Weiss wanted it framed on 60 Minutes

Pelley ultimately refused to make the (inaccurate) changes and said no one ever followed up with him. “It occurred to me that maybe Bari Weiss didn’t see the broadcast and didn’t realize that those changes hadn’t been made,” he says, which, well, you just have to laugh. Still, Pelley says her meddling nearly prevented the entire episode from airing. “That episode came within 19 minutes of not making it to air,” he says. “It was the night of the Grammys. 60 Minutes was the lead-in to the Grammys, and we almost didn’t have a broadcast.” 

Still, Pelley seems a little hesitant to attribute Weiss’ intentions to malice, calling her a “lovely person” and saying what she built with The Free Press “very successful.” “But television’s not her thing,” he says later. “This is like somebody walking up to me and saying, ‘There’s a 747, there are 400 people on it, we need you to fly it to Paris.’ I’m going to decline because I don’t have a clue. And it would have been so much better if Bari Weiss had been offered this job and said, ‘Oh, that’s not for me, I don’t know how to do that.'” 



Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

WhatsApp Catches Spyware Firm NSO Defying No-Hacking Court Order

1 Share
wiredmikey shares a report from SecurityWeek: Meta-owned communications app WhatsApp says it recently detected and disrupted a spear-phishing attempt linked to spyware company NSO Group. The attack is allegedly in defiance of a court order that bars the spyware maker from targeting WhatsApp. WhatsApp filed a lawsuit against NSO in 2019, after it came to light that a zero-day vulnerability had been exploited to deliver spyware to users. [...] NSO has been seeking to overturn the order blocking it from targeting WhatsApp users, arguing that the company will "suffer irreparable harm." According to WhatsApp, the spyware maker has violated the permanent injunction. The messaging app reported on Monday that it had recently learned of a social engineering attack that attempted to trick users into clicking on malicious links. WhatsApp has only shared a few domains as an indicator of compromise (IoC), but says it was able to link the attack to NSO, pointing to similarities to previously reported one-click phishing campaigns tied to the spyware company. WhatsApp says it also caught the attackers creating test accounts and groups. Those accounts and groups have been disabled, but further action is also being taken. WhatsApp says it is asking a federal court to hold NSO in contempt for allegedly violating a permanent injunction barring it from targeting WhatsApp and its users. The company also said it is making a "significant contribution" to the Spyware Accountability Initiative, a fund aimed at exposing and stopping spyware abuse.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Black Market Tinkerers on Facebook Marketplace Offer to Hide 'Recording Lights' on Meta Smartglasses

1 Comment and 2 Shares
People are disabling the "recording light" on Meta's Ray-Ban smartglasses — "by my count, thousands of people," says tech journalist Joanna Stern in a new video report: STERN: "They're hiring people on Facebook Marketplace to drill out the light for as much as $100. According to our reporting, folks are offering this service in at least 30 states — despite Meta's attempts to stop it... In most states, we found multiple listings. In the New York and New Jersey area alone there were 23 listings." Stern watched a man in New Jersey disable and then conceal the light with a drill and dental probe in a New Jersey garage (a skill he learned watching YouTube and TikTok videos). He said the same day he'd already been contacted by eight more interested customers, and Stern also found at least 10 other people willing to do the same thing, just in New Jersey. "But what we found is they're all over the country." Meta sold 7 million smartglasses in 2025, but a Meta spokesperson insisted to the videomaker that a "majority" of their smartglasses owners aren't blocking the recording light. And furthermore, they added "We aggressively target anyone advertising tampering tools, have removed thousands of violating ads and Marketplace listings for these services, and pursue legal action when appropriate." (The reporter acknowledges "many" of the Marketplace ads disappeared after they brought them to Meta's attention — and Meta also said they were working with other retailers and sellers to take down listings for smartglasses-tampering parts.) The reporter also heard from one journalist who said they'd used it so they could record the activities of federal immigration agents without being targeted. "Others told me they just don't want people asking questions when they're recording." (There's video of one young man saying "It's already difficult enough to film in public. I don't want to have a blinking light on my face.") Tampering with smartglasses isn't illegal — though it is against Meta's Terms of Service, and could void your warranty. But a lawyer in the report says recording others without consent may be illegal, depending on a wide range of "jurisdictional nuances" like whether you live in an all-party consent state or a one-party consent state. "This seems to be our new reality," the report concludes: "more cameras, more microphones everywhere, and less certainty about who and what is recording." (Tech blogger John Gruber offered this assessment. "Using a Meta platform to find people to hack a Meta device so you can surreptitiously record strangers. So perfectly Meta.") Stern's report points out that "People are trying to fight back. Apps have popped up that use Bluetooth to scan for nearby camera glasses." (In the video one app-maker wonders why Meta isn't offering the same service themselves. "There are technical solutions to these problems.") Ironically, when I watched the report on YouTube, it was preceded by... an ad for Meta's Ray-Ban AI smartglasses.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
fxer
2 days ago
reply
Seems a little silly to put recording lights on glasses when we're already recorded by over 70 unblinking cameras a day.

https://kdvr.com/news/trending/caught-on-camera-americans-are-captured-an-estimated-70-security-cameras-each-day/amp/
Bend, Oregon
Next Page of Stories