9838 stories
·
100 followers

And now, a brief history of Hollywood's delusional 18-year quest to make a Monopoly movie

1 Share

Not unlike a bored family trapped in close indoor proximity to each other by rain/depression/bees/what have you, Hollywood has been deluding itself for years at this point that there’s some fun to be found in Monopoly. 18 years, in fact, dating back to 2008, when desperate executives at Hasbro first looked at each other, shrugged, and said “Hey, some bright young Hollywood mind will tie themselves into knots coming up with a decent story for a Monopoly movie one of these days, right?” 

Not, as it turns out, so much, even as Deadline reports that Lionsgate is once again taking a stab at getting a movie version of the “franchise” off the ground, now resorting to tapping two different writing teams (A Minecraft Movie‘s Neil Widener and Gavin James, and Dumb Money‘s Rebecca Angelo and Lauren Schuker Blum) at the same time to try to make this damn thing work. Which would, by our count, be something like the sixth (and seventh) attempts at a cinematic Monopoly, dating all the way back to the days when Ridley Scott, of all people, was attached to a version set up at Universal—which then tanked after 2012’s Battleship failed to set the world on fire with its terrifying “pegs going into plastic ships” action. 

After independent producer Randall Emmett took a roll of the dice in the mid-2010s (describing his script as being not unlike The Goonies, while also spinning dreams of a Hungry Hungry Hippos film franchise), the rights landed at Lionsgate, which has now spent more than a decade trying to get this cursed thimble to hop. That includes a version that was apparently going to be written by Gattaca‘s Andrew Niccol, plus a separate take that would have seen Kevin Hart star, and then, most recently, a version penned by Dungeons And Dragons: Honor Among Thieves team John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein. All of which, in case it wasn’t clear, have since been sent straight to cinematic jail. And yet, like play-acting capitalists who believe a big payday is only a quick ride on the Short Line away, Lionsgate keeps trying—now dragging Margot Robbie and her Lucky Chap production company along for the trip, presumably because nobody knows the art of turning toy room plastic into giant stacks of real-world cash like Robbie.

Fact is, Hasbro has been very aggressive, over the last 20 years, about trying to replicate the success it had with the Transformers movies with its other brands—in defiance of the fact that that franchise came pre-equipped with little things like cool robots, characters, and a basic plot, while a Monopoly script is presumably going to have to spend at least a few pages fleshing out the motivations of a sentient shoe with big real estate dreams. The board game has had slightly more success in television—which is to say, it’s had two extremely short-lived game show versions that both failed to last more than two years on the air—with Netflix currently working on a new unscripted series with Studio Lambert, the folks behind The Traitors. Meanwhile, Hasbro continues to remind everybody that Monopoly is “the world’s most popular board game brand,” which it seems to think is an indicator of quality, and not just the fact that not enough people have heard of, like, Wingspan.



Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 hour ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

COMIC: How excessive heat kills and how to stay safe

1 Share
undefined

Human bodies have a natural cooling system, but it can do only so much in high temperatures and humidity. Here's the science behind how heat kills. And how to protect yourself.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
6 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Original Blair Witch star explains why she's staying out of the rebooted woods

1 Share

With yet another reboot of The Blair Witch Project on the way, producers Jason Blum and James Wan appeared on the IndieWire podcast Screen Talk to hype the film, which comes out next year. As a gesture of good faith, Wan spoke to how much it mattered to him to receive the blessings of “all the original people that were involved in the original Blair Witch.” It’s no secret that the trio of stars from the 1999 indie, Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Michael C. Williams, have had a hard time getting paid for their contributions to one of the most successful horror films ever. In the run-up to the reboot’s announcement, they publicly petitioned Lionsgate for retroactive residuals and “meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc,” which bears their name or likeness. It’s a situation not unlike one that Obsession‘s art director is fighting; the cast of the original never received anywhere near the compensation a hit film should pay out. To his credit, Wan successfully enlisted stars Leonard and Williams, writer-directors Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez, and producer Gregg Hale as executive producers on the film. Where was the star of The Blair Witch Project? She’s staying out of it. 

Responding on Facebook to a post about the new film (via Deadline), Donahue clarified her absence. “I was offered an agreement that, for me personally, raised difficult long-term questions about rights, future technological use of identity and voice, the ability to speak freely, and compensation. Ultimately, it just wasn’t something I felt comfortable signing,” she wrote. “I genuinely wish everyone involved well. But preserving my autonomy mattered more to me.”

The new Blair Witch is expected in theaters next year and “will deal with a family that goes on a camping trip but goes missing one by one after they hear strange noises in the forest.” At least they won’t have a digital Heather Donahue to worry about.



Read the whole story
InShaneee
7 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Software Update Automatically Turns off Amazon Delivery Drivers’ AC During Dangerous Summer Heat

2 Shares
Software Update Automatically Turns off Amazon Delivery Drivers’ AC During Dangerous Summer Heat

A software update to some Amazon delivery vehicles is automatically turning off the air conditioning after a few seconds if the driver is not in their seat, according to multiple Amazon delivery drivers who are complaining about the update online. 

According to Amazon delivery drivers, the new update is for the Amazon EDV (electric delivery vehicle), the custom-built Rivian van. Delivery drivers say that this update automatically turns off the air conditioning in the van if the driver is not in the vehicle for more than 30 seconds. Drivers are complaining about the update as the start of the summer season, which can be particularly difficult and dangerous for delivery drivers. 

“As many of you are aware, the EDVs just got a software update where if you are out of your seat for 30 seconds with the side door open, the AC switches off,” one Amazon delivery driver said in an online forum for drivers. “We all hate this obviously.”  

When reached for comment an Amazon spokesperson said that the premise of my questions to the company was inaccurate, but conceded that the van will turn off the AC after 30 seconds under certain conditions that are commonplace during Amazon delivery shifts.  

“Rivian recently released a software update for Electric Delivery Vehicles that actually extends climate control for drivers,” the Amazon spokesperson said. “As a result, the AC now runs for up to 10 minutes after a driver exits the vehicle, ensuring a cool cabin when they return. The timer resets at every stop. The AC only shuts off if the driver sliding door is left open for more than 30 seconds — a battery conservation measure.” 

Amazon delivery drivers discussing the update online say that they are getting in and out of the van so frequently, and are spending most of their time out of the van delivering packages, that the update makes it harder to keep the van cool. 

“Thing is we are up and about waaaay longer than we are driving so the ac turns off and when it turns on again we are already getting up before im the air is even cold,” one driver said. “It effectively made the ac not work and those vans get hot as fuuuck.”

"Every Amazon-branded vehicle is air-conditioned—a feature that exceeds the industry standard—and if the air-conditioning isn’t working in a vehicle, that vehicle is taken out of service immediately," the Amazon spokesperson said. "They also have cooling seats for drivers. This update was intentionally timed ahead of summer to improve driver comfort during the hottest months of the year. Driver safety and comfort in extreme temperatures remains a priority. If drivers have questions about this change, they should touch base with the DSP they work for - as details about this change were shared with them."

Older delivery trucks may not have air conditioning or have air conditioning that breaks often. Delivery drivers for UPS, who are represented by the Teamsters union, negotiated a heat safety agreement with the company in 2023. Amazon has publicly outlined its strategy for keeping all its workers, including delivery drivers, safe during the heat, including using an app to ask drivers to take 10-minute break from the heat by resting in a cool place and drinking water, but Amazon delivery drivers are managed by a nationwide network of subcontractors who drivers say don’t always maintain those standards

As you’ve probably seen in your own neighborhood, delivery drivers will often park their vans wherever they can and deliver packages to multiple addresses on the same block. Amazon automatically turning off the air conditioning while they are out of the van delivering packages means the van can get hot again by the time they get back. As Amazon delivery drivers have to make frequent stops, it’s not hard to imagine why drivers would complain about Amazon automatically shutting down the AC, which makes it more difficult to cool down between stops. 

Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Pokémon Go to the drones

1 Share

Information captured by Pokémon GO players will be used to train military drones and robots, according to DroneXL, from a report by the Dutch newspaper Trouw. The news follows a December 2025 partnership between Pokémon GO makers, Niantic Spatial (née Niantic) and Vantor, a defense and intelligence firm, which is using data amassed from 30 billion Pokémon scans made by players in hot pursuit of a Jigglypuff to train Visual Position Systems for drone warfare. 

The real trouble began around 2021, when Pokémon GO casually began asking players to upload videos of their experience at Pokéstops. They’d even earn extra in-game goodies for scanning the surrounding area, capturing buildings, streets, and trees, and if they allowed Niantic to, you know, hang on to the footage, they could get even more very cool and exclusive in-game loot. That data was incredibly valuable, not only to gamers but also to intelligence and defense contractors, particularly Vantor, which had been doing some aerial positioning since February 2025. Trouw claims those scans were fed as raw material for a Visual Positioning System (VPS) that picks up when GPS fails. GPS signals are regularly jammed in warzones. By combining ground and aerial maps amassed by the game, they effectively do not need GPS. The VPS can find a location based on the detailed 3D world model from just a few pixels without the need for a jamming satellite. 

Vantor, the company that would license the data for VPS, denied using game data for its drones but declined to say whether upcoming models were trained on Pikachu hunts. However, it’s unlikely that the system ever would’ve advanced so quickly without the billions of scans generated by people looking for that smug, lonely Mew. Once the data is in the system, it cannot be traced back to the game. As of December 2025, the game has an average of 110 million active monthly players.

Update (4:52 P.M. 6/11/26 EST): The A.V. Club has received a statement from Niantic Spatial. It reads: “Now as part of Scopely, Pokémon GO data is not shared with Niantic Spatial. AR Scans collected through Pokémon GO were submitted voluntarily by players who opted into the feature and were subject to the applicable Terms of Service and Privacy Policy at the time. The discontinuation of AR scanning and the end of data sharing with Niantic Spatial were part of the transition planning associated with Pokémon GO‘s move to Scopely.” 



Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

In search of lost tunnels

1 Share

Earlier this year, I interviewed a retired steelworker named Tom Wells, who had taken hundreds of color photographs of Chicago’s freight train tunnels in the late 80s and early 90s. At their peak, the tunnels encompassed 60 miles of track, 40 feet below the sidewalk, extending from Superior Street south to 16th. Inside, small train […]

The post In search of lost tunnels appeared first on Chicago Reader.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories