9364 stories
·
97 followers

Final Destination: Bloodlines directors asked Tony Todd to script own goodbye to fans

1 Share

Tony Todd died last November, leaving behind as extensive a horror filmography as anyone. Not only was he the Candyman in Candyman, but appeared in almost all of the Final Destination movies as funeral home owner William Bludworth. Bludworth is back for the upcoming Final Destination: Bloodlines, and producer Craig Perry tells Deadline in a new interview that those on set knew that the project was likely to be Todd’s last while they were filming it. 

“We all knew that he was obviously quite ill, and it was pretty clear that this was going to be the last role he would play in a movie,” Perry tells the trade. “And the fact that it was one of the Final Destination movies made it that much more poignant.” Though the outlet doesn’t go into detail, the upcoming movie apparently explains why Bludworth is so familiar with Death’s plans in the other films, leaving him able to warn characters of what is coming. This is apparently done during a climactic monologue, which was adjusted due to the gravity of Todd’s condition.

“Zach [Lipovsky] and Adam [Stein], our directors, they made a very shrewd decision to take the last couple of lines that were scripted and say, ‘Tony, just say what you would want to say to the fans. What would you like to impart to them in this moment?'” Perry recalls. “So, everything that makes that scene so emotional is authentic because that was just Tony talking through the camera to the very fans who supported him for so many years. So, it was a very magical moment on set. It was an impactful moment, and it’s one I’ll take with me until I go to the grave.”

Final Destination: Bloodlines opens in theaters on May 16, 2025.



Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 hour ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Giant Bomb is now 100% independent

1 Share
No Caption Provided

After over a decade of corporate ownership, Giant Bomb will now be truly independent. We don’t work for a corporation anymore, we work for you (please let us know where to send our PTO requests and expense reports). We're not serving an algorithm or executives, we're serving you, the audience. We want to lean into what’s always made Giant Bomb special, and that’s the people you see and hear on our content, and our extremely passionate community.

Here comes the part that you’re probably expecting!

We want your money. We need your money. Give us money. But for real, this is a big risk we’re taking and keeping Giant Bomb alive is going to rely on the support of the community. As an independent entity now, we can say that all support that we receive from you will go directly towards maintaining and growing Giant Bomb and paying the fine folks that you see on our programming week after week.

Games media has changed dramatically since Giant Bomb launched in 2008, and our new model aims to evolve with the times. We want people to be able to see our content whether they’re able to support us monetarily or not, so the large majority of what we put out will be available for free. That’s how Fortnite works, right? The kids love Fortnite. Dan Ryckert skin coming soon!

Here's what we intended the new sign-up page to look like
Here's what we intended the new sign-up page to look like

If you sign up today, you’ll get ad-free RSS feeds for all of our podcasts and access to premium-only Discord channels (like behind-the-scenes, Town Hall Q&As, and more). We are going to launch very simple and we will grow and adjust from there. This all finally came together literally hours ago, and we couldn't even update the language on the sign up page yet. The perks are a little different from what's listed there, so If you have any questions, reach out on social and we'll get back to you as soon as we can. For example, our Discord verification process might be slow, so bear with us for now!

The store is also back open!

A lot of work is happening behind the scenes and we're moving very fast on this so we can put together this new, independent Giant Bomb. For now, our premium options will be a $9.99 monthly subscription or you can save $20 by signing up for a year at $99.99. Since it bears repeating (and you’ll hear this over and over again from us), all of your support goes straight to Giant Bomb and its lovely personalities.

Can't wait to build this bomb with you (again).



Read the whole story
InShaneee
7 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

Eli Craig says David Zaslav killed a Tucker & Dale vs. Evil TV show

1 Share

Eli Craig has been making the rounds of late, promoting his new horror comedy Clown In A Cornfield. (You can read our own conversation with Craig right here.) That, inevitably, has also included a bit of eulogizing of the writer-director’s breakout film, 2010’s Tucker & Dale vs. Evil, including Craig’s many efforts to get some kind of continuation of the well-remembered Alan Tudyk and Tyler Labine comedy on screens somewhere. And what studio-commanding villain has most recently blocked those efforts? You guessed it: Warner Bros. Discovery’s David Zaslav.

This is per an interview Craig gave to Slashfilm this week, saying that, of the various T&D projects he’s floated in the last 15 years, one of the ones that came closest to actually existing was a TV series, aimed at TNT or TBS. Craig: “It’s always been a struggle. And then when we do set it up, and we get all the pieces together, it gets killed somehow. We almost did a TV show with it that was on TNT/TBS, and you’ll be happy to know that David Zaslav, the slayer of all cinema, came in and put the final nail in the coffin for Tucker And Dale as we were about to go to series, and just cancelled all production.”

Craig gave a few light details about what the series would have looked like, saying it “Was more like Tucker and Dale, but detectives. Detective Tucker and Dale, like, stupidly trying to figure out what’s happening in a world where they’re always getting it wrong and people are dying around them.” (Which does sound like a pretty funny build off of the movie’s premise, which saw Tudyk and Labine play perfectly normal and nice rural guys surrounded by college students who assume they’re murderous backwoodsmen, and get themselves killed panicking about it.) Craig didn’t specify what objections the studio had for the project, but it feels safe to assume this was in that period in the early 2020s when Zaslav was cementing his control of the newly merged Warner Bros. Discovery with a ton of extremely unpopular cost-cutting measures.

Labine most recently starred on the small screen in NBC’s medical drama New Amsterdam, where he was a regular for five seasons. Tudyk, of course, appears all over the place: Syfy’s Resident Alien comes back for its fourth season in June, and you can hear a couple of sentences from him at the very tail end of this week’s episodes of Andor.



Read the whole story
InShaneee
7 hours ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

10 gloriously dumb minutes of "held hostage" Kung Fury 2 leak online

1 Share

More than five years ago, writer, director, and star David Sandberg assembled a crew to film a full-length sequel to 2015’s Kung Fury, his deliriously fun crowdfunded action-comedy short. The film would be bigger than the original half-hour version in every way, expanding out Sandberg’s vision of a slapstick 1980s Miami where superhero-esque “Thunder Cops” battled “Kung Führer” Adolf Hitler and his Nazi army for control of all of time and space. Among other things, Kung Fury: The Movie employed some actual name Hollywood actors (including Michael Fassbender and Arnold Schwarzenegger), and wasn’t shot entirely in Sandberg’s office—although it did still make pretty liberal use of Sandberg’s beloved green-screen. Filming on the movie wrapped in 2019, and the movie entered extensive post-production. But then, in September of 2020, reports broke that a lawsuit had been filed by the movie’s producers against some of its financiers, alleging failure to pony up, and that all work on the movie was being suspended. Five years later, Kung Fury 2 has never seen the light of day in any form.

Until this weekend, when a leaked 10-minute sizzle reel of the movie began circulating online. (We’re not going to bother posting a link, because takedown notices are moving fast this morning, but dedicated Google work will likely unearth it.) We’ll caution that the leaked reel—confirmed as being legitimate by Sandberg, who told Variety it was an internal promo video never intended to be seen by the public—spoils a lot of the story of the movie, and, more importantly, a huge number of its extremely silly, extremely funny gags, so if you’re holding out hope for a full release, you might want to hold off watching to preserve some of the surprise.

That being said, it’s hard to imagine a better advertisement for that full release, because the sizzle reel is one of the most euphorically fun and goofy things we’ve seen in a minute. Fassbender, especially, is an absolute delight, having clearly understood the assignment of playing “no-bullshit renegade FBI agent” Colt Magnum, fitting in perfectly with Sandberg’s deadpan action hero tone. And while Sandberg cautioned that the reel contains “temp VFX,” it nevertheless also looks sick as hell, full of sight gags and insane imagery. In his statement, Sandberg didn’t sound entirely happy about the leak—timed, coincidentally or not, to be just two weeks off from the 10-year anniversary of the original film’s debut at Cannes—but did say “I hope at least people can see the passion that we poured into the movie, the world deserves to see it as it was meant to be seen. This movie has been held hostage for the past 5 years but I promise to keep fighting for it and make sure this film gets the chance it truly deserves.”



Read the whole story
InShaneee
1 day ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

NOAA Retires Extreme Weather Database

1 Share
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced Thursday its well-known "billion-dollar weather and climate disasters" database "will be retired," a move that will make it next to impossible for the public to track the cost of extreme weather and climate events. The weather, climate and oceans agency is also ending other products, it has recently announced, due in large part to staffing reductions. NOAA is narrowing the array of services it provides, with climate-related programs scrutinized especially closely. The disasters database, which will be archived but no longer updated beyond 2024, has allowed taxpayers, media and researchers to track the cost of natural disasters -- spanning extreme events from hurricanes to hailstorms -- since 1980. Its discontinuation is another Trump-administration blow to the public's view into how fossil fuel pollution is changing the world around them and making extreme weather more costly. [...] The database vacuums loss information from throughout the insurance industry, among other public and private sources. According to the database, there were 403 weather and climate disasters totally at least $1 billion in the United States since 1980, totaling more than $2.945 trillion. As of April 8, there had not been any confirmed billion-dollar disasters so far in 2025, but it lists four events as having the potential to make the tally, including the Los Angeles-area wildfires in January. Between 1980 and 2024, there were nine such disasters on average each year, though in the past five years, that annual average has jumped to 24. The record for one year was 28 events in 2023. "What makes this resource uniquely valuable is not just its standardized methodology across decades, but the fact that it draws from proprietary and non-public data sources (such as reinsurance loss estimates, localized government reports, and private claims databases) that are otherwise inaccessible to most researchers," Jeremy Porter, head of climate implications for and co-founder of First Street, a climate risk financial modeling firm, told CNN via email. "Without it, replicating or extending damage trend analyses, especially at regional scales or across hazard types, is nearly impossible without significant funding or institutional access to commercial catastrophe models."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read the whole story
InShaneee
2 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete

The US is reportedly encouraging countries to adopt Musk’s Starlink in tariff trade talks

1 Share

The US government is bringing up Starlink adoption in the midst of tariff trade talks with other countries, according to a report from The Washington Post. In recent weeks, several countries have moved forward with licensing the Elon Musk-owned satellite internet company, including India, Somalia, Lesotho, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Vietnam.

Internal messages seen by The Post suggest that US embassies and the State Department are encouraging countries to make way for US satellite internet services like Starlink. The messages don’t promise lower tariffs in exchange for adopting Starlink, but “they do indicate that Secretary of State Marco Rubio has increasingly instructed officials to push for regulatory approvals for Musk’s satellite firm,” The Post reports.

Sources tell The Post that government officials in India rushed to secure regulatory approval for Starlink “with the understanding that doing so could help them cement trade deals with the administration.” This week, India cleared Starlink’s proposal, bringing it another step closer to establishing its service in the country.

In a statement to The Post, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said “the only consideration in the Trump administration’s trade negotiations with other countries is what’s best for the American people — which includes American companies succeeding at home and abroad” and that President Donald Trump “will not tolerate any conflicts of interest.” The State Department told the outlet that “any patriotic American should want to see an American company’s success on the global stage, especially over compromised Chinese competitors.” SpaceX didn’t immediately respond to The Verge’s request for comment. 

In response to an earlier Washington Post article on the rapid global expansion of Starlink, several Senate Democrats called on President Donald Trump to investigate reports that Musk “used his government role to improperly advance his personal businesses abroad.”

Read the whole story
InShaneee
3 days ago
reply
Chicago, IL
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories